Page 1 of 4

whats wrong with sonic heroes

Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:16 pm
by shadowman
i mean, ive played the demo once and the thing i saw bad about is swiching characters, give me some good reasons why it is bad.

Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 10:51 pm
by Segata
1.) Terrible level design.

2.) Extremely problematic camera.

3.) Refer to reasons 1 and 2.

Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 11:08 pm
by Locit
4. crappy control

5. nonsensical plot

-1. return of metal sonic

Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 11:50 pm
by SuperKnux
6. Charmy Bee.

7. Everybody's voice was rough on the ears.

8. It didn't feel like a Sonic game. It tried to hard to be new and fresh, yet.. failed miserably.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 12:32 am
by Neo Yi
1.) Levels too long for their own good
2.) Too many places to fall and die
3.) Terrible camera
4.) Despite it being a Sonic game, it was too fast in that you had no time to stop whatever random character you had before they fell down some random bottomeless pit.
5.) This is a small irk, but I don't like the checkpoint post because you can easily miss them. The ones in SA and SA2 weren't that hard to miss at all.
~Neo

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:23 am
by Segaholic2
1) Everything.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:39 am
by Green Gibbon!
1) No nekkid boobies

Of course, none of the Sonic games ever had nekkid boobies. It's amazing nobody ever mentions such a prominent flaw.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:48 am
by WhoopA
Not that they would have saved SH in the first place.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:54 am
by hello.jpg
WOW GUYS YOU SURE AREN'T REPEATING YOURSELVES TO THE POINT OF <B>EXACT</B> REPETITION

How DO you manage it?

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:11 am
by Dache
48) Shitty gimmick.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:09 am
by Argent Silver
What wasn't wrong with Sonic Heroes?

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:21 am
by Ash Holt
It had Sonic in it, you have to give it that much.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 10:03 am
by aso
It has pretty good music.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 10:40 am
by Green Gibbon!
Not that they would have saved SH in the first place.
Well, they did a whole hell of alot for DoAX. And they weren't quite nekkid.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 10:57 am
by Locit
But then they did nothing for BMX XXX. But then, nothing could have.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 11:14 am
by Green Gibbon!
True dat.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 11:45 am
by Neo Yi
1) No nekkid boobies

Of course, none of the Sonic games ever had nekkid boobies. It's amazing nobody ever mentions such a prominent flaw.
*points* YOU'RE a prominent flaw! :razz:

I do agree with the above posters, I did enjoy SH's music which says a lot considering I hated nearly 95% of all of SA2's music.
~Neo

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 11:52 am
by shadowman
wow, it does sound prety crapy.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 3:58 pm
by Spazz
Don't forget, you never actually fought Metal Sonic. The final battle was against "Metal Madness." I don't mind that it has Metal Sonic in it, I just hate how much they screwed him up like they seem to do with many other things.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 4:50 pm
by Light Speed
I wanted a one on one battle with Metal Sonic. Instead you had three people, one in super form to take on the bastard.

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 7:52 pm
by Spazz
Exactly, they said they wanted to bring back the classic style, but instead they create a ridiculous style of gameplay and make a horrendous addition to Metal Sonic that just came out of nowhere with no thought of what a realistic version of "Super" Metal Sonic would look like.

Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 12:43 pm
by Ecco
Geez, am I the only one who actually thinks that Sonic Heroes is a very good game?

Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 12:56 pm
by Delphine
Yes.

Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 3:22 pm
by Dache
Yes.

Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 3:44 pm
by Locit
No. There are Nazi scientists who love this game, and long to dream stuff up as horrible and as painful as a Sonic/Sonic clone running around and dying, along with a Knuckles/Knuckles clone and Tails/Tails clone. I, however, hate it with the passion of one thousand suns.